Message ID | CAHc5FiWpUBUDh=8tDaaLRh9fHXT-k3EBj+KdoOGoR=BhYhzrVQ@mail.gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable, archived |
Headers | show |
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 11:27:55PM +0100, Mykyta Iziumtsev wrote: > Add 5GHz band and mark 2.4GHz and 5GHz as NO-OUTDOOR according to > "??????? ??? ???????????? ???????? ???????????????? ??????? > ?? ???????????????? ?????????, ??? ???????????? ???? ?? ???????? > ??????? ?? ????????????" from 27 May 2010. > > Ref: > * #914 / 06 Sep 2007: http://www.ucrf.gov.ua/uk/doc/nkrz/1196068874 > * #1174 / 23 Oct 2008: http://www.nkrz.gov.ua/uk/activities/ruling/1225269361 > (appendix 8) Since regulatory maintainer does not understand Ukrainian, there is little chance to get this patch applied. IMHO this can be solved by: * having official English translation of those document on gov.ua site * provide patch by wlan chip vendor, confirmed by legal deparament of the vendor * provide patch by some known Ukrainian kernel developer, someone who is know by regulatory maintainer and can be trust Stanislaw -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
There is really a little chance in this case. English translation is absent for the referenced docs and I emailed UCRF several months ago regarding terminology clarifications but got no response. Maybe there are more chances with traditional mail or personal visit but I'd not put a lot on that. Regarding 2nd and 3rd cases I have no real assumptions at all. Anyway, it would be better to know John's opinion by himself here. 2012/12/6 Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 11:27:55PM +0100, Mykyta Iziumtsev wrote: >> Add 5GHz band and mark 2.4GHz and 5GHz as NO-OUTDOOR according to >> "??????? ??? ???????????? ???????? ???????????????? ??????? >> ?? ???????????????? ?????????, ??? ???????????? ???? ?? ???????? >> ??????? ?? ????????????" from 27 May 2010. >> >> Ref: >> * #914 / 06 Sep 2007: http://www.ucrf.gov.ua/uk/doc/nkrz/1196068874 >> * #1174 / 23 Oct 2008: http://www.nkrz.gov.ua/uk/activities/ruling/1225269361 >> (appendix 8) > > Since regulatory maintainer does not understand Ukrainian, > there is little chance to get this patch applied. > > IMHO this can be solved by: > > * having official English translation of those document on gov.ua site > * provide patch by wlan chip vendor, confirmed by legal deparament of > the vendor > * provide patch by some known Ukrainian kernel developer, someone > who is know by regulatory maintainer and can be trust > > Stanislaw -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 12/06/2012 10:04 AM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 11:27:55PM +0100, Mykyta Iziumtsev wrote: >> Add 5GHz band and mark 2.4GHz and 5GHz as NO-OUTDOOR according to >> "??????? ??? ???????????? ???????? ???????????????? ??????? >> ?? ???????????????? ?????????, ??? ???????????? ???? ?? ???????? >> ??????? ?? ????????????" from 27 May 2010. >> >> Ref: >> * #914 / 06 Sep 2007: http://www.ucrf.gov.ua/uk/doc/nkrz/1196068874 >> * #1174 / 23 Oct 2008: http://www.nkrz.gov.ua/uk/activities/ruling/1225269361 >> (appendix 8) > > Since regulatory maintainer does not understand Ukrainian, > there is little chance to get this patch applied. > > IMHO this can be solved by: > > * having official English translation of those document on gov.ua site This is always a problem and unlikely to be solved. > * provide patch by wlan chip vendor, confirmed by legal deparament of > the vendor Legal department is not typically (directly) involved in this, but we (Broadcom) have a regulatory department. However, there are OEMs involved as well and some do their own FCC/regulatory certification. The reason why I suggested adding references in the database is that I wanted to get our regulatory department involved to validate at least the correctness of the reference itself. Ideally, I would want them to look at the rules itself. > * provide patch by some known Ukrainian kernel developer, someone > who is know by regulatory maintainer and can be trust I think John relies on community members watching the mailing list that are affiliated with the chip vendors. Especially, when the url takes him to some ukranian document :-) > Stanislaw > Gr. AvS -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt index 4c54543..30d0791 100644 --- a/db.txt +++ b/db.txt @@ -652,8 +652,16 @@ country TR: DFS-ETSI (5170 - 5250 @ 20), (N/A, 20) (5250 - 5330 @ 20), (N/A, 20), DFS +# Source: +# #914 / 06 Sep 2007: http://www.ucrf.gov.ua/uk/doc/nkrz/1196068874 +# #1174 / 23 Oct 2008: http://www.nkrz.gov.ua/uk/activities/ruling/1225269361 +# (appendix 8) +# Listed 5GHz range is a lowest common denominator for all related +# rules in the referenced laws. Such a range is used because of +# disputable definitions there. country UA: - (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 20) + (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (N/A, 20), NO-OUTDOOR + (5150 - 5350 @ 40), (N/A, 20), NO-OUTDOOR country US: DFS-FCC (2402 - 2472 @ 40), (3, 27)