@@ -129,6 +129,14 @@ static void wl18xx_tx_complete_packet(struct wl1271 *wl, u8 tx_stat_byte)
wl1271_free_tx_id(wl, id);
}
+static u8 wl18xx_next_tx_idx(u8 idx)
+{
+ if (++idx >= WL18XX_FW_MAX_TX_STATUS_DESC)
+ idx = 0;
+
+ return idx;
+}
+
void wl18xx_tx_immediate_complete(struct wl1271 *wl)
{
struct wl18xx_fw_status_priv *status_priv =
@@ -161,9 +169,8 @@ void wl18xx_tx_immediate_complete(struct wl1271 *wl)
return;
}
- for (i = priv->last_fw_rls_idx;
- i != status_priv->fw_release_idx;
- i = (i + 1) % WL18XX_FW_MAX_TX_STATUS_DESC) {
+ for (i = priv->last_fw_rls_idx; i != status_priv->fw_release_idx;
+ i = wl18xx_next_tx_idx(i)) {
wl18xx_tx_complete_packet(wl,
status_priv->released_tx_desc[i]);
wl18xx_tx_immediate_complete() iterates through the completed transmit descriptors in a circular fashion, and in doing so uses a modulus operation that is not a power of two. This leads to inefficient code generation, which can be easily solved by providing a helper to increment to the next descriptor. Use this more efficient solution. Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> --- drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl18xx/tx.c | 13 ++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)