diff mbox series

[PATCHv7,bpf-next,24/28] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe_multi usdt test code

Message ID 20230809083440.3209381-25-jolsa@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 4cde2d8aa7f705fdc395e05d4acd7a9512871f59
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Add multi uprobe link | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format fail Series longer than 15 patches (and no cover letter)
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 7 maintainers not CCed: kpsingh@kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev shuah@kernel.org song@kernel.org yonghong.song@linux.dev mykolal@fb.com linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/checkpatch fail ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses WARNING: macros should not use a trailing semicolon
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail merge-conflict

Commit Message

Jiri Olsa Aug. 9, 2023, 8:34 a.m. UTC 
Adding code in uprobe_multi test binary that defines 50k usdts
and will serve as attach point for uprobe_multi usdt bench test
in following patch.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/uprobe_multi.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/uprobe_multi.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/uprobe_multi.c
index d19184103fa3..a61ceab60b68 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/uprobe_multi.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/uprobe_multi.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ 
 
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <string.h>
+#include <sdt.h>
 
 #define __PASTE(a, b) a##b
 #define PASTE(a, b) __PASTE(a, b)
@@ -53,6 +54,27 @@  static int bench(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#define PROBE STAP_PROBE(test, usdt);
+
+#define PROBE10    PROBE PROBE PROBE PROBE PROBE \
+		   PROBE PROBE PROBE PROBE PROBE
+#define PROBE100   PROBE10 PROBE10 PROBE10 PROBE10 PROBE10 \
+		   PROBE10 PROBE10 PROBE10 PROBE10 PROBE10
+#define PROBE1000  PROBE100 PROBE100 PROBE100 PROBE100 PROBE100 \
+		   PROBE100 PROBE100 PROBE100 PROBE100 PROBE100
+#define PROBE10000 PROBE1000 PROBE1000 PROBE1000 PROBE1000 PROBE1000 \
+		   PROBE1000 PROBE1000 PROBE1000 PROBE1000 PROBE1000
+
+static int usdt(void)
+{
+	PROBE10000
+	PROBE10000
+	PROBE10000
+	PROBE10000
+	PROBE10000
+	return 0;
+}
+
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
 	if (argc != 2)
@@ -60,8 +82,10 @@  int main(int argc, char **argv)
 
 	if (!strcmp("bench", argv[1]))
 		return bench();
+	if (!strcmp("usdt", argv[1]))
+		return usdt();
 
 error:
-	fprintf(stderr, "usage: %s <bench>\n", argv[0]);
+	fprintf(stderr, "usage: %s <bench|usdt>\n", argv[0]);
 	return -1;
 }