diff mbox series

[PATCHv7,bpf-next,26/28] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe_multi cookie test

Message ID 20230809083440.3209381-27-jolsa@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit e7cf9a48f8d634a3c65a28715158b6f6c0540e71
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Add multi uprobe link | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format fail Series longer than 15 patches (and no cover letter)
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 8 maintainers not CCed: kpsingh@kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev shuah@kernel.org song@kernel.org yonghong.song@linux.dev mykolal@fb.com iii@linux.ibm.com linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/checkpatch warning CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis CHECK: No space is necessary after a cast WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations WARNING: externs should be avoided in .c files WARNING: line length of 85 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 90 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 96 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail merge-conflict

Commit Message

Jiri Olsa Aug. 9, 2023, 8:34 a.m. UTC
Adding test for cookies setup/retrieval in uprobe_link uprobes
and making sure bpf_get_attach_cookie works properly.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c     | 78 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
index 26b2d1bffdfd..1454cebc262b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ 
 #include <bpf/btf.h>
 #include "test_bpf_cookie.skel.h"
 #include "kprobe_multi.skel.h"
+#include "uprobe_multi.skel.h"
 
 /* uprobe attach point */
 static noinline void trigger_func(void)
@@ -239,6 +240,81 @@  static void kprobe_multi_attach_api_subtest(void)
 	bpf_link__destroy(link1);
 	kprobe_multi__destroy(skel);
 }
+
+/* defined in prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c */
+void uprobe_multi_func_1(void);
+void uprobe_multi_func_2(void);
+void uprobe_multi_func_3(void);
+
+static void uprobe_multi_test_run(struct uprobe_multi *skel)
+{
+	skel->bss->uprobe_multi_func_1_addr = (__u64) uprobe_multi_func_1;
+	skel->bss->uprobe_multi_func_2_addr = (__u64) uprobe_multi_func_2;
+	skel->bss->uprobe_multi_func_3_addr = (__u64) uprobe_multi_func_3;
+
+	skel->bss->pid = getpid();
+	skel->bss->test_cookie = true;
+
+	uprobe_multi_func_1();
+	uprobe_multi_func_2();
+	uprobe_multi_func_3();
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uprobe_multi_func_1_result, 1, "uprobe_multi_func_1_result");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uprobe_multi_func_2_result, 1, "uprobe_multi_func_2_result");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uprobe_multi_func_3_result, 1, "uprobe_multi_func_3_result");
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uretprobe_multi_func_1_result, 1, "uretprobe_multi_func_1_result");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uretprobe_multi_func_2_result, 1, "uretprobe_multi_func_2_result");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uretprobe_multi_func_3_result, 1, "uretprobe_multi_func_3_result");
+}
+
+static void uprobe_multi_attach_api_subtest(void)
+{
+	struct bpf_link *link1 = NULL, *link2 = NULL;
+	struct uprobe_multi *skel = NULL;
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_uprobe_multi_opts, opts);
+	const char *syms[3] = {
+		"uprobe_multi_func_1",
+		"uprobe_multi_func_2",
+		"uprobe_multi_func_3",
+	};
+	__u64 cookies[3];
+
+	cookies[0] = 3; /* uprobe_multi_func_1 */
+	cookies[1] = 1; /* uprobe_multi_func_2 */
+	cookies[2] = 2; /* uprobe_multi_func_3 */
+
+	opts.syms = syms;
+	opts.cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(syms);
+	opts.cookies = &cookies[0];
+
+	skel = uprobe_multi__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "uprobe_multi"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	link1 = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(skel->progs.uprobe, -1,
+						 "/proc/self/exe", NULL, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link1, "bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	cookies[0] = 2; /* uprobe_multi_func_1 */
+	cookies[1] = 3; /* uprobe_multi_func_2 */
+	cookies[2] = 1; /* uprobe_multi_func_3 */
+
+	opts.retprobe = true;
+	link2 = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(skel->progs.uretprobe, -1,
+						      "/proc/self/exe", NULL, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link2, "bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi_retprobe"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	uprobe_multi_test_run(skel);
+
+cleanup:
+	bpf_link__destroy(link2);
+	bpf_link__destroy(link1);
+	uprobe_multi__destroy(skel);
+}
+
 static void uprobe_subtest(struct test_bpf_cookie *skel)
 {
 	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_uprobe_opts, opts);
@@ -515,6 +591,8 @@  void test_bpf_cookie(void)
 		kprobe_multi_attach_api_subtest();
 	if (test__start_subtest("uprobe"))
 		uprobe_subtest(skel);
+	if (test__start_subtest("multi_uprobe_attach_api"))
+		uprobe_multi_attach_api_subtest();
 	if (test__start_subtest("tracepoint"))
 		tp_subtest(skel);
 	if (test__start_subtest("perf_event"))