Message ID | 20210327143452.1514392-1-f4bug@amsat.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | memory: Add 'priority' property setter | expand |
On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 at 14:34, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote: > > The first patch is an old fix, it would be nice to get it > merged eventually, but not a problem during years, so can > also wait 6.1. > > The second patch add the memory_region_set_priority() helper > useful to memory controller devices. > > The rest add the 'size'/'priority' object setters. Do you have a series which makes use of these new APIs? thanks -- PMM
On 3/27/21 5:58 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 at 14:34, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote: >> >> The first patch is an old fix, it would be nice to get it >> merged eventually, but not a problem during years, so can >> also wait 6.1. >> >> The second patch add the memory_region_set_priority() helper >> useful to memory controller devices. >> >> The rest add the 'size'/'priority' object setters. > > Do you have a series which makes use of these new APIs? Yes, new board / SoC, many patches, I'm trying to split to have review because I don't expect many developers to review a series adding 20+ devices... So far: 87 files changed, 8805 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-) Part of them already posted: - hw/misc: Add support for interleaved memory accesses https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg730721.html - memory_region_add_subregion_aliased() helper https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg795414.html I can send an omnibus series if you prefer. Thanks, Phil.
On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 at 18:44, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote: > > On 3/27/21 5:58 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 at 14:34, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote: > >> > >> The first patch is an old fix, it would be nice to get it > >> merged eventually, but not a problem during years, so can > >> also wait 6.1. > >> > >> The second patch add the memory_region_set_priority() helper > >> useful to memory controller devices. > >> > >> The rest add the 'size'/'priority' object setters. > > > > Do you have a series which makes use of these new APIs? > > Yes, new board / SoC, many patches, I'm trying to split to > have review because I don't expect many developers to review > a series adding 20+ devices... > I can send an omnibus series if you prefer. No, you don't need to send a series, but a brief description of the kind of device that would want to be able to dynamically set MR size and priority would be helpful, I think. thanks -- PMM