Message ID | 20231011111438.909552-2-cleger@rivosinc.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | riscv: report more ISA extensions through hwprobe | expand |
correct misspelling of "fatorize" in subject line rday
Drew, On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 01:14:26PM +0200, Clément Léger wrote: > Factorize ISA extension reporting by using a macro rather than > copy/pasting extension names. This will allow adding new extensions more > easily. > > Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com> > --- > arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c | 26 ++++++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c > index 473159b5f303..5ce593ce07a4 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c > @@ -145,20 +145,18 @@ static void hwprobe_isa_ext0(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair, > for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) { We were gonna add a comment here about when it is and is not safe to use riscv_isa_extension_available() IIRC. Did that ever end up in a patch? > struct riscv_isainfo *isainfo = &hart_isa[cpu]; > > - if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBA)) > - pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA; > - else > - missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA; > - > - if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBB)) > - pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB; > - else > - missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB; > - > - if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBS)) > - pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS; > - else > - missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS; > +#define CHECK_ISA_EXT(__ext) \ > + do { \ > + if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, __ext)) \ > + pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_##__ext; \ > + else \ > + missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_##__ext; \ > + } while (false) \ > + > + CHECK_ISA_EXT(ZBA); > + CHECK_ISA_EXT(ZBB); > + CHECK_ISA_EXT(ZBS); > +#undef CHECK_ISA_EXT > } > > /* Now turn off reporting features if any CPU is missing it. */ > -- > 2.42.0 >
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 02:53:43PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > Drew, > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 01:14:26PM +0200, Clément Léger wrote: > > Factorize ISA extension reporting by using a macro rather than > > copy/pasting extension names. This will allow adding new extensions more > > easily. > > > > Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com> > > --- > > arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c | 26 ++++++++++++-------------- > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c > > index 473159b5f303..5ce593ce07a4 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c > > @@ -145,20 +145,18 @@ static void hwprobe_isa_ext0(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair, > > for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) { > > We were gonna add a comment here about when it is and is not safe to use > riscv_isa_extension_available() IIRC. Did that ever end up in a patch? Yup, it's in [1]. But that series may be hung up on spec stuff, so maybe it'd be better for Clément to integrate it. And, it appears we definitely need this macro, because it has now been suggested by three different people :-) (I later saw Samuel was first[2], but I hadn't seen his before submitting mine, otherwise I would have given him the credit.) [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230918131518.56803-11-ajones@ventanamicro.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230712084134.1648008-4-sameo@rivosinc.com/ Thanks, drew > > > struct riscv_isainfo *isainfo = &hart_isa[cpu]; > > > > - if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBA)) > > - pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA; > > - else > > - missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA; > > - > > - if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBB)) > > - pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB; > > - else > > - missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB; > > - > > - if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBS)) > > - pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS; > > - else > > - missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS; > > +#define CHECK_ISA_EXT(__ext) \ > > + do { \ > > + if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, __ext)) \ > > + pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_##__ext; \ > > + else \ > > + missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_##__ext; \ > > + } while (false) \ > > + > > + CHECK_ISA_EXT(ZBA); > > + CHECK_ISA_EXT(ZBB); > > + CHECK_ISA_EXT(ZBS); > > +#undef CHECK_ISA_EXT > > } > > > > /* Now turn off reporting features if any CPU is missing it. */ > > -- > > 2.42.0 > >
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c index 473159b5f303..5ce593ce07a4 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c @@ -145,20 +145,18 @@ static void hwprobe_isa_ext0(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair, for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) { struct riscv_isainfo *isainfo = &hart_isa[cpu]; - if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBA)) - pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA; - else - missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA; - - if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBB)) - pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB; - else - missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB; - - if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBS)) - pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS; - else - missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS; +#define CHECK_ISA_EXT(__ext) \ + do { \ + if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, __ext)) \ + pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_##__ext; \ + else \ + missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_##__ext; \ + } while (false) \ + + CHECK_ISA_EXT(ZBA); + CHECK_ISA_EXT(ZBB); + CHECK_ISA_EXT(ZBS); +#undef CHECK_ISA_EXT } /* Now turn off reporting features if any CPU is missing it. */
Factorize ISA extension reporting by using a macro rather than copy/pasting extension names. This will allow adding new extensions more easily. Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com> --- arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c | 26 ++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)