Message ID | 20190817093902.2171-10-lucas.demarchi@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A1F56FE for <patchwork-intel-gfx@patchwork.kernel.org>; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 09:39:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD0428A60 for <patchwork-intel-gfx@patchwork.kernel.org>; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 09:39:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 8419D28A69; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 09:39:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46AE028A60 for <patchwork-intel-gfx@patchwork.kernel.org>; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 09:39:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A076E2F7; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 09:39:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABF4789BE8 for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 09:39:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Aug 2019 02:39:30 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,396,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="376950606" Received: from vidyashr-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO ldmartin-desk1.intel.com) ([10.251.152.227]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Aug 2019 02:39:29 -0700 From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 02:38:31 -0700 Message-Id: <20190817093902.2171-10-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190817093902.2171-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> References: <20190817093902.2171-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/40] drm/i915/bdw+: Enable PSR in any eDP port X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development <intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>, <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx> List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org> List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>, <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP |
Series |
Tiger Lake batch 3
|
expand
|
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c index 29169e2435e8..5d7baac1d7c9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c @@ -589,11 +589,9 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, /* * HSW spec explicitly says PSR is tied to port A. - * BDW+ platforms have a instance of PSR registers per transcoder but - * for now it only supports one instance of PSR, so lets keep it - * hardcoded to PORT_A + * BDW+ platforms have a instance of PSR registers per transcoder. */ - if (dig_port->base.port != PORT_A) { + if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) && dig_port->base.port != PORT_A) { DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR condition failed: Port not supported\n"); return; }