Message ID | 11975904.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | PCI/PM: Improvements related to device transitions into D0 | expand |
Hi Rafael, On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 04:17:41PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi All, > > On Saturday, April 9, 2022 3:03:14 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > This series supersedes the one at > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/4198163.ejJDZkT8p0@kreacher > > > > It addresses some potential issues related to PCI device transitions from > > low-power states into D0 and makes the related code more straightforward > > and so easier to follow. > > > > Please refer to the patch changelogs for details. > > Here's a v2 of this patch series which is being sent, because I realized that > one of the checks in pci_power_up() added by patch [4/7] in v1 was redundant > and can be dropped, but that affected the last 3 patches in the series and > then I noticed that more improvements were possible and hence the new patches > [2/9]. I sent a few minor nits separately. The series looks good to me in general and certainly improves readability :) Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Hi Mika, On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 1:24 PM Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 04:17:41PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > On Saturday, April 9, 2022 3:03:14 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > This series supersedes the one at > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/4198163.ejJDZkT8p0@kreacher > > > > > > It addresses some potential issues related to PCI device transitions from > > > low-power states into D0 and makes the related code more straightforward > > > and so easier to follow. > > > > > > Please refer to the patch changelogs for details. > > > > Here's a v2 of this patch series which is being sent, because I realized that > > one of the checks in pci_power_up() added by patch [4/7] in v1 was redundant > > and can be dropped, but that affected the last 3 patches in the series and > > then I noticed that more improvements were possible and hence the new patches > > [2/9]. > > I sent a few minor nits separately. The series looks good to me in > general and certainly improves readability :) > > Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Thank you! I'll address the issues that you have pointed out and send a v3 of this series later this week.