Message ID | 20221111122015.516946468@linutronix.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Handled Elsewhere |
Headers | show |
Series | genirq, PCI/MSI: Support for per device MSI and PCI/IMS - Part 1 cleanups | expand |
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 02:55:07PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > There is no point in doing the same sanity checks over and over in a loop > during MSI-X enablement. Put them in front of the loop and return early > when they fail. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> > --- > drivers/pci/msi/msi.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) > > --- a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c > @@ -721,47 +721,31 @@ static int msix_capability_init(struct p > return ret; > } > > -static int __pci_enable_msix(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msix_entry *entries, > - int nvec, struct irq_affinity *affd, int flags) > +static bool pci_msix_validate_entries(struct msix_entry *entries, int nvec, int hwsize) > { > - int nr_entries; > int i, j; > > - if (!pci_msi_supported(dev, nvec) || dev->current_state != PCI_D0) > - return -EINVAL; > + if (!entries) > + return true; > > - nr_entries = pci_msix_vec_count(dev); > - if (nr_entries < 0) > - return nr_entries; > - if (nvec > nr_entries && !(flags & PCI_IRQ_VIRTUAL)) > - return nr_entries; > - > - if (entries) { > - /* Check for any invalid entries */ > - for (i = 0; i < nvec; i++) { > - if (entries[i].entry >= nr_entries) > - return -EINVAL; /* invalid entry */ > - for (j = i + 1; j < nvec; j++) { > - if (entries[i].entry == entries[j].entry) > - return -EINVAL; /* duplicate entry */ > - } > + for (i = 0; i < nvec; i++) { > + /* Entry within hardware limit? */ > + if (entries[i].entry >= hwsize) > + return false; > + > + /* Check for duplicate entries */ > + for (j = i + 1; j < nvec; j++) { > + if (entries[i].entry == entries[j].entry) > + return false; > } > } > - > - /* Check whether driver already requested for MSI IRQ */ > - if (dev->msi_enabled) { > - pci_info(dev, "can't enable MSI-X (MSI IRQ already assigned)\n"); > - return -EINVAL; > - } > - return msix_capability_init(dev, entries, nvec, affd); > + return true; > } > > -int __pci_enable_msix_range(struct pci_dev *dev, > - struct msix_entry *entries, int minvec, > - int maxvec, struct irq_affinity *affd, > - int flags) > +int __pci_enable_msix_range(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msix_entry *entries, int minvec, > + int maxvec, struct irq_affinity *affd, int flags) > { > - int rc, nvec = maxvec; > + int hwsize, rc, nvec = maxvec; > > if (maxvec < minvec) > return -ERANGE; > @@ -774,6 +758,23 @@ int __pci_enable_msix_range(struct pci_d > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(dev->msix_enabled)) > return -EINVAL; > > + if (!pci_msi_supported(dev, nvec) || dev->current_state != PCI_D0) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + hwsize = pci_msix_vec_count(dev); > + if (hwsize < 0) > + return hwsize; > + > + if (!pci_msix_validate_entries(entries, nvec, hwsize)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + /* PCI_IRQ_VIRTUAL is a horrible hack! */ > + if (nvec > hwsize && !(flags & PCI_IRQ_VIRTUAL)) > + nvec = hwsize; > + > + if (nvec < minvec) > + return -ENOSPC; > + > rc = pci_setup_msi_context(dev); > if (rc) > return rc; > @@ -785,7 +786,7 @@ int __pci_enable_msix_range(struct pci_d > return -ENOSPC; > } > > - rc = __pci_enable_msix(dev, entries, nvec, affd, flags); > + rc = msix_capability_init(dev, entries, nvec, affd); > if (rc == 0) > return nvec; > >
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 02:55:07PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > There is no point in doing the same sanity checks over and over in a loop > during MSI-X enablement. Put them in front of the loop and return early > when they fail. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > --- > drivers/pci/msi/msi.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) > + /* PCI_IRQ_VIRTUAL is a horrible hack! */ New comment too :) Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Jason
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > Sent: Friday, November 11, 2022 9:55 PM > > @@ -785,7 +786,7 @@ int __pci_enable_msix_range(struct pci_d > return -ENOSPC; > } > > - rc = __pci_enable_msix(dev, entries, nvec, affd, flags); > + rc = msix_capability_init(dev, entries, nvec, affd); > if (rc == 0) > return nvec; > The check in following lines doesn't make sense now: if (rc < minvec) return -ENOSPC;
--- a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c +++ b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c @@ -721,47 +721,31 @@ static int msix_capability_init(struct p return ret; } -static int __pci_enable_msix(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msix_entry *entries, - int nvec, struct irq_affinity *affd, int flags) +static bool pci_msix_validate_entries(struct msix_entry *entries, int nvec, int hwsize) { - int nr_entries; int i, j; - if (!pci_msi_supported(dev, nvec) || dev->current_state != PCI_D0) - return -EINVAL; + if (!entries) + return true; - nr_entries = pci_msix_vec_count(dev); - if (nr_entries < 0) - return nr_entries; - if (nvec > nr_entries && !(flags & PCI_IRQ_VIRTUAL)) - return nr_entries; - - if (entries) { - /* Check for any invalid entries */ - for (i = 0; i < nvec; i++) { - if (entries[i].entry >= nr_entries) - return -EINVAL; /* invalid entry */ - for (j = i + 1; j < nvec; j++) { - if (entries[i].entry == entries[j].entry) - return -EINVAL; /* duplicate entry */ - } + for (i = 0; i < nvec; i++) { + /* Entry within hardware limit? */ + if (entries[i].entry >= hwsize) + return false; + + /* Check for duplicate entries */ + for (j = i + 1; j < nvec; j++) { + if (entries[i].entry == entries[j].entry) + return false; } } - - /* Check whether driver already requested for MSI IRQ */ - if (dev->msi_enabled) { - pci_info(dev, "can't enable MSI-X (MSI IRQ already assigned)\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } - return msix_capability_init(dev, entries, nvec, affd); + return true; } -int __pci_enable_msix_range(struct pci_dev *dev, - struct msix_entry *entries, int minvec, - int maxvec, struct irq_affinity *affd, - int flags) +int __pci_enable_msix_range(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msix_entry *entries, int minvec, + int maxvec, struct irq_affinity *affd, int flags) { - int rc, nvec = maxvec; + int hwsize, rc, nvec = maxvec; if (maxvec < minvec) return -ERANGE; @@ -774,6 +758,23 @@ int __pci_enable_msix_range(struct pci_d if (WARN_ON_ONCE(dev->msix_enabled)) return -EINVAL; + if (!pci_msi_supported(dev, nvec) || dev->current_state != PCI_D0) + return -EINVAL; + + hwsize = pci_msix_vec_count(dev); + if (hwsize < 0) + return hwsize; + + if (!pci_msix_validate_entries(entries, nvec, hwsize)) + return -EINVAL; + + /* PCI_IRQ_VIRTUAL is a horrible hack! */ + if (nvec > hwsize && !(flags & PCI_IRQ_VIRTUAL)) + nvec = hwsize; + + if (nvec < minvec) + return -ENOSPC; + rc = pci_setup_msi_context(dev); if (rc) return rc; @@ -785,7 +786,7 @@ int __pci_enable_msix_range(struct pci_d return -ENOSPC; } - rc = __pci_enable_msix(dev, entries, nvec, affd, flags); + rc = msix_capability_init(dev, entries, nvec, affd); if (rc == 0) return nvec;
There is no point in doing the same sanity checks over and over in a loop during MSI-X enablement. Put them in front of the loop and return early when they fail. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> --- drivers/pci/msi/msi.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)