Message ID | AM5PR0701MB265751E3A716081292C5224FE4450@AM5PR0701MB2657.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | Johannes Berg |
Headers | show |
Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> writes: > I was looking at usually suppressed gcc warnings, > [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] in this case: > > The code definitely looks like a break is missing here. > However I am not able to test the NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT, > nor do I actually know what might be :) > So please use this patch with caution and only if you are > able to do some testing. > > Signed-off-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> > --- > net/wireless/nl80211.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) You should use prefix "nl80211: " in the title. https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches#subject
diff --git a/net/wireless/nl80211.c b/net/wireless/nl80211.c index 4eece06..6537b5d 100644 --- a/net/wireless/nl80211.c +++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c @@ -4409,6 +4409,7 @@ static int parse_station_flags(struct genl_info *info, params->sta_flags_mask = BIT(NL80211_STA_FLAG_AUTHENTICATED) | BIT(NL80211_STA_FLAG_MFP) | BIT(NL80211_STA_FLAG_AUTHORIZED); + break; default: return -EINVAL; }
I was looking at usually suppressed gcc warnings, [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] in this case: The code definitely looks like a break is missing here. However I am not able to test the NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT, nor do I actually know what might be :) So please use this patch with caution and only if you are able to do some testing. Signed-off-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> --- net/wireless/nl80211.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) -- 1.9.1