diff mbox series

[43/36] xfs_db: refactor multi-fsb object detection decision making

Message ID 20190320193721.GG1183@magnolia (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Headers show
Series xfsprogs-5.0: fix various problems | expand

Commit Message

Darrick J. Wong March 20, 2019, 7:37 p.m. UTC
From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

Pull the "is this a multi-fsb object" decision into a separate function
that we can keep close to the actual multi-fsb object dispatcher.  We
will soon make the machinery more complex so we do this to avoid having
a big hairy if statement.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
---
 db/metadump.c |   13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Eric Sandeen April 4, 2019, 11:49 p.m. UTC | #1
On 3/20/19 2:37 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> 
> Pull the "is this a multi-fsb object" decision into a separate function
> that we can keep close to the actual multi-fsb object dispatcher.  We
> will soon make the machinery more complex so we do this to avoid having
> a big hairy if statement.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
>  db/metadump.c |   13 ++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/db/metadump.c b/db/metadump.c
> index 83a257d0..57216291 100644
> --- a/db/metadump.c
> +++ b/db/metadump.c
> @@ -1979,6 +1979,16 @@ process_multi_fsb_dir(
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static bool
> +is_multi_fsb_object(
> +	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
> +	typnm_t			btype)
> +{
> +	if (btype == TYP_DIR2 && mp->m_dir_geo->fsbcount > 1)
> +		return true;
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  process_multi_fsb_objects(
>  	xfs_fileoff_t	o,
> @@ -2011,6 +2021,7 @@ process_bmbt_reclist(
>  	xfs_fileoff_t		last;
>  	xfs_agnumber_t		agno;
>  	xfs_agblock_t		agbno;
> +	bool			is_multi_fsb = is_multi_fsb_object(mp, btype);
>  	int			error;
>  
>  	if (btype == TYP_DATA)
> @@ -2074,7 +2085,7 @@ process_bmbt_reclist(
>  		}
>  
>  		/* multi-extent blocks require special handling */
> -		if (btype != TYP_DIR2 || mp->m_dir_geo->fsbcount == 1) {
> +		if (!is_multi_fsb) {
>  			error = process_single_fsb_objects(o, s, c, btype, last);
>  		} else {
>  			error = process_multi_fsb_objects(o, s, c, btype, last);
> 

kind of a dumb nitpick, but "if not is" seems kind of backwards, perhaps

		if (is_multi_fsb) {
 			error = process_multi_fsb_objects(o, s, c, btype, last);
 		} else {
 			error = process_single_fsb_objects(o, s, c, btype, last);
 		}

is more natural?
Darrick J. Wong April 5, 2019, 12:01 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 06:49:10PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 3/20/19 2:37 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > 
> > Pull the "is this a multi-fsb object" decision into a separate function
> > that we can keep close to the actual multi-fsb object dispatcher.  We
> > will soon make the machinery more complex so we do this to avoid having
> > a big hairy if statement.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
> >  db/metadump.c |   13 ++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/db/metadump.c b/db/metadump.c
> > index 83a257d0..57216291 100644
> > --- a/db/metadump.c
> > +++ b/db/metadump.c
> > @@ -1979,6 +1979,16 @@ process_multi_fsb_dir(
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static bool
> > +is_multi_fsb_object(
> > +	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
> > +	typnm_t			btype)
> > +{
> > +	if (btype == TYP_DIR2 && mp->m_dir_geo->fsbcount > 1)
> > +		return true;
> > +	return false;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int
> >  process_multi_fsb_objects(
> >  	xfs_fileoff_t	o,
> > @@ -2011,6 +2021,7 @@ process_bmbt_reclist(
> >  	xfs_fileoff_t		last;
> >  	xfs_agnumber_t		agno;
> >  	xfs_agblock_t		agbno;
> > +	bool			is_multi_fsb = is_multi_fsb_object(mp, btype);
> >  	int			error;
> >  
> >  	if (btype == TYP_DATA)
> > @@ -2074,7 +2085,7 @@ process_bmbt_reclist(
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		/* multi-extent blocks require special handling */
> > -		if (btype != TYP_DIR2 || mp->m_dir_geo->fsbcount == 1) {
> > +		if (!is_multi_fsb) {
> >  			error = process_single_fsb_objects(o, s, c, btype, last);
> >  		} else {
> >  			error = process_multi_fsb_objects(o, s, c, btype, last);
> > 
> 
> kind of a dumb nitpick, but "if not is" seems kind of backwards, perhaps
> 
> 		if (is_multi_fsb) {
>  			error = process_multi_fsb_objects(o, s, c, btype, last);
>  		} else {
>  			error = process_single_fsb_objects(o, s, c, btype, last);
>  		}
> 
> is more natural?

Fewest changes necessary, but yes, I will rework that to be less awkward.

--D
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/db/metadump.c b/db/metadump.c
index 83a257d0..57216291 100644
--- a/db/metadump.c
+++ b/db/metadump.c
@@ -1979,6 +1979,16 @@  process_multi_fsb_dir(
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static bool
+is_multi_fsb_object(
+	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
+	typnm_t			btype)
+{
+	if (btype == TYP_DIR2 && mp->m_dir_geo->fsbcount > 1)
+		return true;
+	return false;
+}
+
 static int
 process_multi_fsb_objects(
 	xfs_fileoff_t	o,
@@ -2011,6 +2021,7 @@  process_bmbt_reclist(
 	xfs_fileoff_t		last;
 	xfs_agnumber_t		agno;
 	xfs_agblock_t		agbno;
+	bool			is_multi_fsb = is_multi_fsb_object(mp, btype);
 	int			error;
 
 	if (btype == TYP_DATA)
@@ -2074,7 +2085,7 @@  process_bmbt_reclist(
 		}
 
 		/* multi-extent blocks require special handling */
-		if (btype != TYP_DIR2 || mp->m_dir_geo->fsbcount == 1) {
+		if (!is_multi_fsb) {
 			error = process_single_fsb_objects(o, s, c, btype, last);
 		} else {
 			error = process_multi_fsb_objects(o, s, c, btype, last);