diff mbox series

[057/200] mm: memcontrol: eliminate redundant check in __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded()

Message ID 20201215030628.lkr_4fDa4%akpm@linux-foundation.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [001/200] kthread: add kthread_work tracepoints | expand

Commit Message

Andrew Morton Dec. 15, 2020, 3:06 a.m. UTC
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Subject: mm: memcontrol: eliminate redundant check in __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded()

The mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess check is exactly the
else case of mz->usage_in_excess < mz_node->usage_in_excess.  So we could
replace else if (mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess) with
else equally.  Also drop the comment which doesn't really explain much.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201012131607.10656-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/memcontrol.c |    9 ++-------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~mm-memcontrol-eliminate-redundant-check-in-__mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -623,14 +623,9 @@  static void __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded
 		if (mz->usage_in_excess < mz_node->usage_in_excess) {
 			p = &(*p)->rb_left;
 			rightmost = false;
-		}
-
-		/*
-		 * We can't avoid mem cgroups that are over their soft
-		 * limit by the same amount
-		 */
-		else if (mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess)
+		} else {
 			p = &(*p)->rb_right;
+		}
 	}
 
 	if (rightmost)